昆虫学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (9): 1270-1281.doi: 10.16380/j.kcxb.2025.09.011

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

十四种杀虫剂对天敌益蝽的安全性及对其捕食效能影响

李文红1,2,3,*, 田旭1,4,5, 金杰1,4, 杨灿1, 孙智荣6, 黄纯杨7, 汪汉成5   

  1. (1. 贵州省农业科学院植物保护研究所, 贵阳 550006; 2. 植物病虫害综合治理全国重点实验室贵州研究中心, 贵阳 550006;
    3. 贵州省绿色植保技术应用工程实验室, 贵阳 550006; 4. 长江大学农学院, 荆州 434025; 5. 贵州省烟草科学研究院, 贵阳 550081; 6. 贵州省黔西南州烟草公司, 兴义 562400; 7. 贵州省遵义市烟草公司, 遵义 563000)
  • 出版日期:2024-09-20 发布日期:2025-10-28

Effects of fourteen insecticides on the safety and predatory efficiency of the natural enemy Picromerus lewisi (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)

LI Wen-Hong1,2,3,*, TIAN Xu1,4,5, JIN Jie1,4, YANG Can1, SUN Zhi-Rong6, HUANG Chun-Yang7, WANG Han-Cheng5   

  1. (1. Institute of Plant Protection, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, China; 2. Guizhou Branch of State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Guiyang 550006, China; 3. Guizhou Provincial Laboratory of Green Technology and Application Engineering of Plant Protection, Guiyang 550006, China; 4. College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China; 5. Guizhou Academy of Tobacco Science, Guiyang 550081, China; 6. Guizhou Qianxinan Prefectural Tobacco Company, Xingyi 562400, China; 7. Guizhou Zunyi Prefectural Tobacco Company, Zunyi 563000, China)
  • Online:2024-09-20 Published:2025-10-28

摘要:  【目的】探明常用杀虫剂对天敌益蝽Picromerus lewis的安全性及对其捕食功能的影响。【方法】采用喷雾法测试6类14种杀虫剂[溴虫氟苯双酰胺、溴氰虫酰胺、氯虫苯甲酰胺和氟苯虫酰胺(双酰胺类),高效氯氟氰菊酯(拟除虫菊酯类),吡虫啉、氟吡呋喃酮和氟啶虫胺腈(新烟碱及类似物类),三氟苯嘧啶(介离子类),甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐、多杀霉素和阿维菌素(大环内酯类)及生物源类(苏云金芽孢杆菌Bacillus thuringiensis和金龟子绿僵菌Metarhizium anisopliae CQMa421)]对益蝽3龄若虫的致死中浓度(median lethal concentration, LC50),以安全系数评价药剂对益蝽的安全性,通过圆盘方程拟合其中4种杀虫剂(高效氯氟氰菊酯、溴氰虫酰胺、吡虫啉和阿维菌素)处理的益蝽3龄若虫对黏虫Mythimna seperata 2和3龄幼虫的捕食效能。【结果】氯虫苯甲酰胺、溴氰虫酰胺和阿维菌素对益蝽3龄若虫的安全性相对较高,其中氟苯虫酰胺对益蝽3龄若虫的安全性最高, 24 h的LC50值为369.71 mg/L,安全系数为7.39;高效氯氟氰菊酯、吡虫啉和溴虫氟苯双酰胺对益蝽3龄若虫的安全性较低,其中溴虫氟苯双酰胺对益蝽3龄若虫的安全性最低, 24 h内的LC50值为0.01 mg/L,安全系数低于0.01。氟啶虫胺腈、氯虫苯甲酰胺、氟苯虫酰胺和溴氰虫酰胺处理48 h对益蝽3龄若虫的安全性相对较高,其中氟苯虫酰胺对益蝽3龄若虫的安全性最高, LC50值为299.28 mg/L,安全系数为5.99;相反,溴虫氟苯双酰胺、吡虫啉和高效氯氟氰菊酯对益蝽3龄若虫的安全性较低,其中溴虫氟苯双酰胺对益蝽3龄若虫的安全性最低, LC50值为0.04 mg/L,安全系数低于0.01。生物源杀虫剂中金龟子绿僵菌CQMa421和苏云金芽孢杆菌对益蝽3龄若虫相对安全。与0.1% Triton X-100处理的对照相比, 4种杀虫剂(高效氯氟氰菊酯、溴氰虫酰胺、吡虫啉和阿维菌素)胁迫降低了益蝽3龄若虫的捕食效能,仅对瞬时攻击率无显著影响,其中20 mg/L溴氰虫酰胺胁迫下益蝽3龄若虫捕食黏虫2和3龄幼虫的瞬时攻击率最高(分别为0.623和0.586), 2 mg/L阿维菌素胁迫下益蝽3龄若虫捕食黏虫2和3龄幼虫的处理猎物时间最短(分别为0.091 和0.076 d)、日最大捕食量最高(分别为11.00和13.12头)且捕食效能最高(分别为4.72和5.34), 2 mg/L吡虫啉胁迫下益蝽3龄若虫捕食黏虫2和3龄幼虫的捕食效能最低(分别为2.46和2.08)。【结论】氯虫苯甲酰胺、氟苯虫酰胺和金龟子绿僵菌CQMa421对益蝽若虫的安全性较高,溴虫氟苯双酰胺和吡虫啉对益蝽若虫的安全性较低;阿维菌素和溴氰虫酰胺处理对益蝽若虫的捕食能力影响较小,吡虫啉处理对益蝽若虫的捕食能力影响较大。结果对指导益蝽田间害虫防治时避免杀虫剂的毒害具有重要指导作用。

关键词: 益蝽, 黏虫, 杀虫剂, 安全性, 捕食效能

Abstract: 【Aim】To explore the safety of commonly used insecticides to the natural enemy Picromerus lewisi and their impact on predation function.【Methods】The spraying method was applied to detect the median lethal concentration (LC50) values of 14 insecticides of 6 categories [broflanilide, cyantraniliprole, chlorantraniliprole and flubendiamide (diamides), lambda-cyhalothrin (pyrethroids), imidacloprid, flupyradifurone and sulfoxaflor (neonicotinoids and analogues), triflumezopyrim (mesoionics), emamectin benzoate, spinosad and abamectin (macrolides), and bioinsecticides (Bacillus thuringiensis and Metarhizium anisopliae CQMa421)] against the 3rd instar nymphs of P. lewisi, and the safety factor was used to evaluate their safety to P. lewisi. In addition, the predatory efficiency of the 3rd instar nymphs of P. lewisi treated with four insecticides mentioned above (lambda-cyhalothrin, cyantraniliprole, imidacloprid and abamectin) on the 2nd and 3rd instar larvae of Mythimna seperata was analyzed using the disc equation. 【Results】Chlorantraniliprole, cyantraniliprole and abamectin exhibited relatively high safety levels to the 3rd instar nymphs of P. lewisi, and flubendiamide demonstrated the highest safety to the 3rd instar nymphs of P. lewisi, with the LC50 value of 369.71 mg/L in 24 h and the safety factor of 7.39. In contrast, lambda-cyhalothrin, imidacloprid and broflanilide exhibited lower safety to the 3rd instar nymphs of P. lewisi, and broflanilide showed the lowest safety to the 3rd instar nymphs of P. lewisi, with the LC50 value of 0.01 mg/L in 24 h and the safety factor of below 0.01. After 48-h treatment, sulfoxaflor, chlorantraniliprole, flubendiamide and cyantraniliprole maintained relatively high safety to the 3rd instar nymphs of P. lewisi, and flubendiamide was recorded to have the highest safety to the 3rd instar nymphs of P. lewisi, with the LC50 value of 299.28 mg/L and the safety factor of 5.99. Conversely, broflanilide, imidacloprid and lambda-cyhalothrin exhibited lower safety to the 3rd instar nymphs of P. lewisi, and broflanilide had the lowest safety to the 3rd instar nymphs of P. lewisi, with the LC50 value of 0.04 mg/L in 48 h and the safety factor of below 0.01. The bioinsecticides M. anisopliae CQMa421 and B. thuringiensis were found to be relatively safe to the 3rd instar nymphs of P. lewisi. Compared to the control treated with 0.1% Triton X-100, the stress from the four insecticides (lambda-cyhalothrin, cyantraniliprole, imidacloprid and abamectin) reduced the predation efficiency of the 3rd instar nymphs of P. lewisi, although had no significant effect on the instantaneous attack rate. Notably, under the stress of 20 mg/L cyantraniliprole, the 3rd instar nymphs of P. lewisi had the highest instantaneous attack rates (0.623 and 0.586, respectively) on the 2nd and 3rd instar larvae of M. seperata.  Under the stress of 2 mg/L abamectin, the 3rd instar nymphs of P. lewisi nymphs had the shortest handling time for prey (0.091 and 0.076 d, respectively), the highest maximum daily predation amount (11.00 and 13.12 individuals, respectively) and the highest predatory efficiency (4.72 and 5.34, respectively) on the 2nd and 3rd instar larvae of M. seperata, while under the stress of 2 mg/L imidacloprid, the 3rd instar nymphs of P. lewisi had the lowest predation efficiency (2.46 and 2.08, respectively) on the 2nd and 3rd instar larvae of M. seperata. 【Conclusion】Chlorantraniliprole, flubendiamide and M. anisopliae CQMa421 demonstrated higher safety to P. lewisi nymphs, whereas broflanilide and imidacloprid exhibited lower safety to P. lewisi nymphs. Additionally, treatments with abamectin and cyantraniliprole had minimal impact on the predation capability of P. lewisi nymphs, while imidacloprid treatment significantly affected their predation capability. These findings play a crucial role in providing information for pest management strategies in agricultural environments by minimizing the toxicity of insecticides.

Key words:  Picromerus lewisi, Mythimna seperata, pesticide, safety, predation efficiency