昆虫学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (2): 302-318.doi: 10.16380/j.kcxb.2026.02.014

• 综 述 • 上一篇    下一篇

环裂下目分类、系统发育及基因组的研究进展

袁缓, 陈斌*   

  1. (重庆师范大学昆虫与分子生物学研究所, 媒介生物控制和利用重庆市重点实验室, 重庆 401331)
  • 出版日期:2026-02-20 发布日期:2026-03-19

Research progresses of the classification,phylogeny and genome of the Cyclorrhapha (Insecta: Diptera)

YUAN Huan, CHEN Bin*   

  1. (Chongqing Key Laboratory of Vector Control and Utilization, Institute of Entomology and Molecular Biology, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China)
  • Online:2026-02-20 Published:2026-03-19

摘要:  环裂下目(Cyclorrhapha)是昆虫纲(Insecta)双翅目(Diptera)短角亚目(Brachycera)中最大适应辐射类群,占双翅目已知物种多样性的近43%。环裂下目全球广泛分布,生物学习性多样,在生态系统中扮演重要角色。环裂下目不仅是媒介生物、传粉昆虫、法医昆虫和天敌昆虫等多领域的研究热点,也是探究双翅目短角亚目系统演化及其适应辐射的关键类群,但其分类系统混乱,内部系统发育关系远不明晰。为重建环裂下目内部的系统发育关系,许多研究双翅目昆虫的学者依据不同类型的数据和方法先后对该类群开展过不同层面的研究。环裂下目的单系性得到了普遍支持,进一步归类为并系的无缝组(Aschiza)和单系的有缝组(Schizophora)。环裂下目约有15总科103科,在科级水平,扁足蝇总科(Platypezoidea)和蚜蝇总科(Syrphoidea)的成员科在环裂下目基部的系统地位存在争议;蚜蝇总科的单系性在形态和分子证据下不一致;有缝组内部分科的地位仍不明确[如短芒腐木蝇科(Acartophthalmidae)、刺股蝇科(Megamerinidae)、佛蝇科(Fergusoninidae)、妖蝇科(Mormotomyiidae)、Marginidae、鼓翅蝇科(Sepsidae)和尖尾蝇科(Lonchaeidae)等];部分亚科的科级地位提升存在争议[如澳蝇科(Sciadoceridae)、岸蝇科(Tethinidae)、Stenomicridae、Campichoetidae和Heteromyzidae]。尽管环裂下目有瓣类(Calyptratae)在系统发育研究中取得了显著进展,然而其余类群受限于采样覆盖不足、分子数据覆盖度不均及化石证据匮乏,其系统发育关系与演化历史仍存在诸多未解之谜。本文系统梳理了环裂下目分类系统的历史变化,并综合评述其系统发育研究进展,总结目前存在的系统发育争议问题和基因组数据现状,并提出相关研究建议,为下一步基于系统基因组学探究系统发育关系及演化历史提供借鉴。

关键词: 双翅目, 环裂下目, 分类学, 系统发育学, 基因组, 演化

Abstract: Cyclorrhapha represents the most extensive adaptive radiation group within the Brachycera suborder of Diptera of Insecta, encompassing approximately 43% of the overall species diversity within this order. This group exhibits cosmopolitan distribution and enormously diverse living habits, and plays an important role in ecosystems. Cyclorrhapha is not only hotspots in multiple fields, including vector organisms, pollinators, forensic medicine insects and natural enemy insects, but also serves as a critical group for understanding the systematic evolution of Brachycera and its adaptive radiation, but its classification system is chaotic, and its phylogenetic relationship is far from clear. To reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships within the Cyclorrhapha, numerous dipterists have conducted investigations across various taxonomic levels employing diverse data types and methods. Cyclorrhapha is robustly supported as a monophyletic group, and it is further categorized into paraphyletic Aschiza and monophyletic Schizophora. There are about 103 families of 15 superfamilies in Cyclorrhapha. However, the systematic position of the member families of Platypezoidea and Syrphoidea, at the base of Cyclorrhapha remains contentious. The monophyly of Syrphoidea is inconsistent with morphological and molecular evidence, and the taxonomic status of several families within Schizophora, including Acartophthalmidae, Megamerinidae, Fergusoninidae, Mormotomyiidae, Marginidae, Sepsidae, Lonchaeidae and so on, is still ambiguous. Additionally, the elevation of certain subfamilies, such as Sciadoceridae, Tethinidae, Stenomicridae, Campichoetidae and Heteromyzidae, to family status is also debated. While significant advancements have been made in the phylogenetic research of Calyptratae, other groups within Cyclorrhapha are hindered by limited sampling coverage, uneven molecular data coverage, and a lack of fossil evidence, leaving many aspects of their phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history unresolved. In this article, we systematically reviewed the historical changes of the classification systems of Cyclorrhapha, and comprehensively reviewed the current research progress of its phylogeny, summarized the existing phylogenetic controversy and the present status of genome data, and put forward relevant research suggestions, providing theoretical guidance for future explorations of the phylogenetic relationship and evolution history based on phylogenomics.

Key words: Diptera, Cyclorrhapha, taxonomy, phylogenetic, genome, evolution