室内条件下云斑天牛成虫相遇行为反应

›› 2012, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 70-76.doi:

室内条件下云斑天牛成虫相遇行为反应

杨桦, 杨伟, 杨春平, 杨茂发, 王保新, 朱天辉, 黄琼

四川农业大学林学院，四川省林业生态工程省级重点实验室, 四川雅安 625014

收稿日期:2011-07-12 修回日期:2011-12-22 出版日期:2012-01-20 发布日期:2012-01-20
通讯作者: 杨伟 E-mail:ywei0218@yahoo.com.cn
作者简介:杨桦，男， 1982年9月出生，四川峨眉人，博士，从事动物生态研究， E-mail: yanghua151017@163.com
基金资助:
四川省教育厅重点实验室专项(2006ZD011)；四川农业大学“211工程”双支计划资助项目(00370101)；四川农业大学长江上游生态林业工程建设资助项目

Behavioral responses of encountering adults of the white-striped longhorn beetle, Batocera lineolata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), in the laboratory conditions

YANG Hua, YANG Wei, YANG Chun-Ping, YANG Mao-Fa, WANG Bao-Xin, ZHU Tian-Hui, HUANG Qiong

Key Laboratory of Ecological Forestry Engineering of Sichuan Province, College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an, Sichuan 625014, China

Received:2011-07-12 Revised:2011-12-22 Online:2012-01-20 Published:2012-01-20
Contact: YANG Wei E-mail:ywei0218@yahoo.com.cn
About author: yanghua151017@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探索云斑天牛Batocera lineolata Chevrolat雌雄成虫的交配机制，采用室内饲养观察和视频轨迹捕捉系统(EthoVision 3.1)自动记录分析相结合的方法，对云斑天牛的两性相遇行为进行了研究。行为仪分析结果表明，雌雌、雄雄与雌雄相遇过程中，雌雄在轨迹相交时间和净相对运动上显著长于雌雌和雄雄(P<0.05)，而在反应前时间上显著短于雌雌和雄雄相遇情况(P<0.05)。室内试验观察表明，云斑天牛成虫相遇包括避让、打斗和交配3种行为。雌雌相遇发生避让的频率最高为80.98%(P<0.05)。雄雄相遇发生避让的频率为78.03%，显著高于发生打斗的频率21.96%(P<0.05)；雌、雄成虫与正在交配的一对成虫相遇发生避让的频率显著高于另外3种行为［打斗(继续交配)、打斗(结束交配)、打斗(与后来者交配)］(P<0.05)，雌、雄成虫发生避让、打斗(继续交配)和打斗(结束交配)3种行为的发生频率存在性别差异(P<0.05)；当雄雄相遇中成虫是初次相遇时，在发生打斗的频率上显著高于再次相遇(P<0.05)，成虫在雄雄相遇发生避让的频率上，再次相遇显著高于初次相遇(P<0.05)，雌雄成虫初次相遇发生交配的频率显著高于再次相遇的频率(P<0.05)。云斑天牛成虫相遇行为的研究为研究云斑天牛召唤机制、性信息素的生物合成及成虫繁殖行为学提供了依据。

关键词: 云斑天牛, 行为反应, 相遇行为, 避让, 打斗, 交配

Abstract: In order to search the mating system of male and female adults of the white-striped longhorn beetle, Batocera lineolata Chevrolat, we studied the encountering behavior of male and female of B. lineolata by laboratory observation in combination with automatic record and analysis through video tracking capture system (EthoVision 3.1). The test results by behavior instrument showed that the intersection time of two tracks and net relative movements between one male and one female were longer than that between one female and one female or between one male and one male during the encountering process (P<0.05), while their reaction time was shorter than that for female-female or male-male (P<0.05). In the laboratory experiment, it was observed that the encountering process of B. lineolata included three behaviors, i.e., avoidance, fight and mating. During female-female encountering process, the maximum voidance rate was 80.98% (P<0.05). In male-male encountering, the avoidance rate was 78.03%, which was much higher than the fight rate of 21.96% (P<0.05). Avoidance rate between one male or female and a couple under mating process was much higher than that for another three behaviors, i.e., fight (continue to mate), fight (finish mating) and fight (mate with new comers) (P<0.05). There was a sexual difference (P<0.05) in occurrence frequency of these three bahaviors, i.e., avoidance, fight (continue to mate) and fight (finish mating) between the male and the female. If it was the first encountering for two males, the fight rate was much higher than that for their second encountering (P<0.05), and the avoidance rate for their second encountering was much higher than that for the first time (P<0.05). But the mating rate for the first encountering of a male and a female was much higher than that for their second encountering (P<0.05). The study upon encountering behavior of B. lineolata provides the basis for studying calling mechanism and sex pheromone biosynthesis of B. lineolata as well as reproductive behavior of the adults.

Key words: Batocera lineolata, behavioral response, encountering behavior, avoidance behavior, fighting behavior, mating behavior

中图分类号:

Q968

杨桦, 杨伟, 杨春平, 杨茂发, 王保新, 朱天辉, 黄琼. 室内条件下云斑天牛成虫相遇行为反应[J]. , 2012, 55(1): 70-76.

YANG Hua, YANG Wei, YANG Chun-Ping, YANG Mao-Fa, WANG Bao-Xin, ZHU Tian-Hui, HUANG Qiong. Behavioral responses of encountering adults of the white-striped longhorn beetle, Batocera lineolata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), in the laboratory conditions[J]. , 2012, 55(1): 70-76.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: http://www.insect.org.cn/CN/

http://www.insect.org.cn/CN/Y2012/V55/I1/70

[1]	张方梅, 乔利, 潘鹏亮, 王国君, 尹健, 陈利军. 灰茶尺蠖对三种非寄主植物精油的触角电位和行为反应[J]. , 2018, 61(5): 565-573.
[2]	罗丽林, 李莉. 管氏肿腿蜂的交配行为[J]. , 2018, 61(5): 604-612.
[3]	张文璐, 王文强, 白树雄, 张天涛, 何康来, 王振营. 亚洲玉米螟雌蛾产卵偏好寄主植物的筛选及对葎草挥发性化学成分的电生理反应[J]. , 2018, 61(2): 224-231.
[4]	李定旭, 权澎琪, 董钧锋, 胡镇杰, 杨海博, 陈汉杰. 山楂叶螨雄螨繁殖潜力[J]. , 2017, 60(5): 562-569.
[5]	王宏民, 杨萌萌, 张耀文, 张仙红. 绿豆象成虫对绿豆豆荚挥发物的触角电位和行为反应[J]. , 2017, 60(2): 148-154.
[6]	门金, 曹丹丹, 赵斌, 王伟超, 刘鹏程, 魏建荣. 不同寄主来源种群花绒寄甲成虫对桃红颈天牛幼虫虫粪的行为趋性和种群控制效果[J]. , 2017, 60(2): 229-236.
[7]	李晓维, 孙冉冉, 章金明, 张治军, 吕要斌. 西花蓟马成虫昼间交配习性和聚集信息素释放节律[J]. , 2017, 60(12): 1439-1446.
[8]	张秀歌, 张小娇, 肖春, 董文霞. 离腹寡毛实蝇两性通讯及行为[J]. , 2017, 60(11): 1349-1360.
[9]	张丛丛, 王蒙, 苏鹏, 樊斌琦, 王焱, 郝德君. 香樟齿喙象的交配和产卵行为[J]. , 2017, 60(10): 1208-1215.
[10]	李娜, 范凡, 韩慧, 裴晓亚, 刘顺, 魏国树. 不同波长LED光源对韭菜迟眼蕈蚊生殖行为的影响[J]. , 2016, 59(5): 546-551.
[11]	Ankita DUBEY, OMKAR, Geetanjali MISHRA. 成虫体型大小驱动六斑月瓢虫性间相互选择[J]. , 2016, 59(2): 209-218.
[12]	邱小芳, 谢建坤, 吴丽萍, 喻琴, 张萌萌, 王光耀, 徐韶晖, 涂小云. 光周期变化对毛健夜蛾交配和产卵的影响[J]. , 2016, 59(10): 1103-1114.
[13]	应丰泽, 孙艳春, 潘李隆, 洪越, 刘树生. 两个入侵烟粉虱隐种MEAM1与MED对番茄黄曲叶病毒水平传播能力的比较[J]. , 2015, 58(8): 872-880.
[14]	江珊珊, 邓青, 范佳, 孙京瑞, 陈巨莲. 麦长管蚜对E-β-法尼烯的嗅觉行为反应[J]. , 2015, 58(7): 776-782.
[15]	石庆型, 罗庆怀, 赵龙, 周正湘, 何广全, 韦卫. 与中红侧沟茧蜂生境与寄主定位相关的玉米及棉铃虫幼虫体表挥发性成分的提取与鉴定[J]. , 2015, 58(3): 244-255.