›› 2018, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (1): 103-113.doi: 10.16380/j.kcxb.2018.01.012

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国库蚊属四十个种(亚种)的分子系统发育关系研究(双翅目: 蚊科)

孙玲, 付文博, 闫振天, 陈斌*   

  1.  (重庆师范大学昆虫与分子生物学研究所,媒介昆虫重庆市重点实验室, 重庆 401331)
  • 出版日期:2018-01-20 发布日期:2018-01-20

Molecular phylogenetic relationships among forty species (subspecies) of the genus Culex (Diptera: Culicidae) from China

SUN Ling, FU WenBo, YAN ZhenTian, CHEN Bin*   

  1.  (Chongqing Key Laboratory of Vector Insects,Institute of Entomology and Molecular Biology, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China)
  • Online:2018-01-20 Published:2018-01-20

摘要: 【目的】对在中国有分布的库蚊属Culex种(亚种)的COⅠ序列和ITS2序列进行测序,构建和讨论这些种(亚种)的分子系统发育关系。【方法】测定了库蚊属20个种(亚种)的COⅠ和ITS2序列,并从NCBI数据库中下载了库蚊属另外20个种(亚种)的COⅠ和3个种(亚种)的ITS2序列。对库蚊属40个种(亚种)的COⅠ序列和其中23个种(亚种)的ITS2序列进行碱基构成、种间遗传距离和饱和度分析,并对COⅠ+ITS2序列进行ILD (incongruence length difference)检验。分别使用2种分子数据集(COⅠ和ITS2)的核苷酸序列,用最大似然法(ML)、贝叶斯法(BI)、邻接法(NJ)和最大简约法(MP)推断这些种的系统发育关系。通过Kishino-Hasegawa (KH)和Shimodaira-Hasegawa (SH)检验评估这4种系统树间的差异,确定最为合理的系统发育树。【结果】本研究新测序获得20种(亚种)的COⅠ和ITS2序列的长度范围分别为625~685 bp和300~559 bp。COⅠ和ITS2序列在库蚊属成对蚊种间的遗传距离分别是0.002~0.198和0.006~1.807。库蚊属23个种(亚种)的COⅠ+ITS2序列的ILD检验结果显示,数据集具有不相容性,因此COⅠ+ITS2序列不适用于这些种(亚种)的系统发育研究。经KH和SH检验显示,4种系统发育树中,基于COⅠ序列构建的BI树最为合理,而基于ITS2序列构建的MP树最为合理。基于COⅠ核苷酸序列所构建的BI树显示,除幼小库蚊Cx. infantulus和短须库蚊Cx. brevipalpis外,各亚属间成员聚类结果与传统的形态学归类结果吻合;路蚊亚属Lutiza和包蚊亚属Barraudius都归入库蚊亚属Culex内;梅蚊亚属Maillotia和新库蚊亚属Nexoculex聚为一支;库状蚊亚属Culiciomyia、真黑蚊亚属Eumelanomyia和簇角蚊亚属Lophoceramyia均显示为单系。基于ITS2序列所构建的MP树显示,各亚属间和种(亚种)间关系混乱。【结论】重建的分子系统发育树表明库蚊亚属不是一个单系群。在重建库蚊属系统发育关系时,相较于ITS2和COⅠ+ITS2,COⅠ是更为理想的分子标记。本研究构建的分子系统发育关系为中国库蚊属中各亚属和各种(亚种)之间的亲缘关系的研究奠定了基础。
 

关键词: 蚊科, 库蚊属, 分子标记, COⅠ, ITS2, 系统发育, 中国

Abstract: 【Aim】 To sequence the COⅠ and ITS2 sequences of the Culex species (subspecies) with distribution record in China, and to construct and discuss the molecular phylogenetic relationships among these species (subspecies). 【Methods】 COⅠ and ITS2 sequences of a total of 20 Culex species (subspecies) were newly sequenced, and COⅠ sequences of other 20 Culex species (subspecies) and ITS2 sequences of other three Culex species (subspecies) were downloaded from NCBI databases. The base composition, interspecific genetic distance and saturation analysis of COⅠ of 40 species (subspecies) and ITS2 sequences of 23 species (subspecies) were analyzed, and the incongruence length difference (ILD) test was conducted for COⅠ+ITS2 sequences. The phylogenetic relationships of these Culex species (subspecies) were inferred using maximum likelihood (ML), Bayesian interference (BI), neighbor joining (NJ) and maximum parsimony (MP) based on the nucleotide sequences of two molecular data sets (COⅠ and ITS2), respectively. Kishino-Hasegawa (KH) and Shimodaira-Hasegawa (SH) tests were used to evaluate the differences of these four phylogenetic trees constructed, and the most reasonable phylogenetic tree was selected. 【Results】 The newly sequenced COⅠ and ITS2 sequences are 625-685 and 300-559 bp in length, respectively. The pairwise genetic distances among Culex mosquito species (subspecies) range from 0.002 to 0.198 for COⅠ and from 0.006 to 1.807 for ITS2. The ILD test of COⅠ+ITS2 sequences of 23 Culex species (subspecies) showed that the data set was incompatible, so COⅠ+ITS2 sequences were inappropriate to construct the phylogenetic trees of these species (subspecies). By KH and SH tests among these four phylogenetic trees, the BI tree based on COⅠ sequence was the most reasonable tree, while the MP tree based on ITS2 sequence was the most reasonable tree. The BI tree constructed based on the COⅠ nucleotide sequences showed that all members, except for Cx. infantulus and Cx. brevipalpis of the same subgenus, are clustered together, which is consistent with the traditional morphological classification. Both the subgenus Lutiza and Barraudius are grouped into the subgenus Culex. The subgenus Maillotia and subgenus Nexoculex are grouped together. The subgenus Culiciomyia, subgenus Eumelanomyia and subgenus Lophoceramyia are monophyletic. The MP tree based on the ITS2 sequences showed that the relationships between subgenera and species (subspecies) are chaotic. 【Conclusion】 The molecular phylogenetic tree reconstructed shows that the subgenus Culex is not a monophyletic group. Compared with ITS2 and COⅠ+ITS2, COⅠ is a more desirable molecular marker for the reconstruction of the phylogeny of Culex species. The molecular phylogenetic relationships reconstructed in this study lay a foundation for studying the phylogenetic relationships among subgenera and species (subspecies) of the genus Culex in China.

Key words: Culicidae, Culex, molecular marker, COⅠ, ITS2, phylogeny, China