昆虫学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (6): 682-693.doi: 10.16380/j.kcxb.2021.06.004

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

大分舌蜂不同龄期幼虫及滞育预蛹肠道细菌 群落多样性及其差异

寇若玫, 李月, 窦飞越, 周泽扬, 黄敦元*   

  1. (重庆师范大学生命科学学院, 媒介昆虫重庆市重点实验室, 重庆 401331)
  • 出版日期:2021-06-20 发布日期:2021-06-15

Diversity and differences of gut bacterial communities in different instar larvae and diapause prepupae of Colletes gigas (Hymenoptera: Colletidae)

KOU Ruo-Mei, LI Yue, DOU Fei-Yue, ZHOU Ze-Yang, HUANG Dun-Yuan*   

  1.  (Chongqing Key Laboratory of Vector Insects, College of Life Sciences, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China)
  • Online:2021-06-20 Published:2021-06-15

摘要:

【目的】基于昆虫肠道微生物在宿主健康与调控宿主生长发育中发挥着重要作用,本研究旨在对大分舌蜂Colleles gigas不同龄期幼虫及滞育预蛹肠道细菌群落多样性及其差异进行初步探究。【方法】利用野外采集的大分舌蜂1-5龄幼虫及滞育预蛹,提取肠道内容物细菌DNA进行16S rRNA的V3-V4基因片段PCR扩增,利用IlluminaMiseq二代高通量测序技术进行测序。依据获得的序列数据,利用生物信息学方法分析大分舌蜂幼虫和滞育预蛹肠道细菌的组成、丰度和多样性。【结果】大分舌蜂幼虫肠道细菌菌群共检测到15门,23纲,43目,80科,128属的细菌,其中最主要的门是变形菌门(Proteobacteria)(占93.74%),最主要的目是立克次氏体目(Rickettsiales)(占68.68%),最主要的科是无形体科(Anaplasmataceae)(占68.64%),最主要的属是沃尔巴克氏体属Wolbachia(占68.64%)。Beta多样性分析结果显示,细菌群落变化与幼虫发育有关,显示出低龄组(1-3龄幼虫)、高龄组(4-5龄幼虫)和滞育预蛹组3个水平。Alpha多样性分析显示,滞育预蛹组细菌多样性与高龄组和低龄组的存在显著差异,而高龄组与低龄组间差异不显著。线性判别分析结果显示,滞育预蛹组与低龄组都存在显著优势菌纲,分别是α-变形菌纲(Alphaproteobacteria)和γ变形菌纲(Gammaproteobacteria),而高龄组不存在显著优势纲。在目水平,肠杆菌目(Enterobacteriales)和假单胞菌目(Pseudomonadales)为低龄组优势目,立克次氏体目(Rickettsiales)为滞育预蛹组的优势目。在科水平,肠杆菌科(Enterobacteriaceae)和莫拉氏菌科(Moraxellaceae)为低龄组的优势科,无形体科(Anaplasmataceae)为滞育预蛹组的优势科。在属水平,低龄组优势属为肠杆菌属 Enterobacter和不动杆菌属Acinetobacter,滞育预蛹组优势属为沃尔巴克氏体属 Wolbachia。功能基因注释结果也显示出这3个组的特点。【结论】大分舌蜂不同龄期幼虫及滞育预蛹肠道细菌群落存在显著差异,从低龄组向高龄组再到滞育预蛹组,细菌多样性逐步降低,这可能与其进食特点以及肠道微生物驱动对肠道环境适应有关。本研究为土壤筑巢独栖野生蜜蜂肠道微生物研究奠定基础,也为此类野生蜜蜂的保护提供新的角度与方向。

关键词: 大分舌蜂, 肠道细菌, 细菌多样性, 幼虫, 滞育预蛹, 发育, 高通量测序

Abstract: 【Aim】 Based on the important role of insect gut microorganisms in host health, growth and development, this study aims to preliminarily explore the diversity and differences of gut bacterial communities in different instar larvae and diapause prepupae of Colleles gigas. 【Methods】 The V3-V4 gene fragment of 16S rRNA was amplified by PCR using the bacterial DNA extracted from the gut contents of the 1st-5th instar larvae and diapause prepupae of C. gigas collected from the field, and was sequenced by IlluminaMiseq second-generation high-throughput sequencing technology. Based on the obtained sequence data, the composition, abundance and diversity of gut bacteria of larvae and diapause prepupae of C. gigas were analyzed by bioinformatics methods. 【Results】 Bacteria of 15 phyla, 23 classes, 43 orders, 80 families and 128 genera were detected in the gut bacterial communities of C. gigas larvae, of which the main phylum, order, family and genera were Proteobacteria (accounting for 93.74%), Rickettsiales (accounting for 68.68%), Anaplasmataceae (accounting for 68.64%), and Wolbachia (accounting for 68.64%), respectively. Beta diversity analysis showed that the gut bacterial community changed with the development of larvae, and could be divided into three groups: early instar group (1st-3rd instar larva), late instar group (4th-5th instar larva) and diapause prepupa group. Alpha diversity analysis showed that there was a significant difference in the gut bacterial diversity between the diapause prepupa group and the late instar group and early instar group, while the gut bacterial diversity between the late instar group and the early instar group showed no significant difference. The linear discriminant analysis results showed that there was significantly dominant class in both diapause prepupa group and early instar group, being Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria, respectively, but no dominant class existed in the late instar group. At the order level, Enterobacteriales and Pseudomonadales were dominant in the early instar group, and Rickettsiales was dominant in the diapause prepupa group. At the family level, Enterobacteriaceae and Moraxellaceae were dominant in the early instar group, and Anaplasmataceae was dominant in the diapause prepupa group. At the genus level, Enterobacter and Acinetobacter were dominant in the early instar group, and Wolbachia was dominant in the diapause prepupa group. The results of functional gene annotation also showed the characteristics of the three groups. 【Conclusion】 There are significant differences in the community structure of gut bacteria in different instar larvae and diapause prepupae of C. gigas. The bacterial diversity decreases gradually from the early instar group to the late instar group and then to the diapause prepupa group, and this may be related to the feeding characteristics and adaptation of gut microorganisms to the gut environment. This study lays a foundation for the study of gut microorganisms of soil-nesting wild bees and also provides a new angle and direction for the protection of this kind of wild bees.

Key words: Colleles gigas, gut bacteria, bacterial diversity, larva, diapause prepupa, development, high-throughput sequencing