昆虫学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (2): 213-222.doi: 10.16380/j.kcxb.2024.02.007

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于刺探电位技术的四个枸杞品种对棉蚜的抗性评价

马银香, 王新谱*   

  1. (宁夏大学农学院, 银川 750021)
  • 出版日期:2024-02-20 发布日期:2024-03-27

Evaluation of resistance of four wolfberry varieties to Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae) by electrical penetration graph technology

MA Yin-Xiang, WANG Xin-Pu*   

  1. (School of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)
  • Online:2024-02-20 Published:2024-03-27

摘要: 【目的】明确4个枸杞品种对棉蚜Aphis gossypii的抗性差异,以探明抗虫因子及位点,并筛选抗蚜枸杞品种。【方法】利用刺吸电位图谱(electrical penetration graph, EPG)技术记录棉蚜成蚜在4个枸杞品种(宁杞1号、宁杞5号、宁杞7号和宁杞10号)上的取食行为,并利用室内抗蚜性鉴定和聚类分析相结合的方法对不同枸杞品种对棉蚜成蚜的抗性进行综合评价。【结果】棉蚜成蚜在取食4个枸杞品种时呈现出Np, A, G, B, C, Pd, E和F波8种波形。在棉蚜成蚜的取食过程中, E1总持续时间在宁杞1号上最长,在宁杞5号和宁杞7号上次之,在宁杞10号上最短; E2波持续时间以在宁杞10号上最长,在宁杞1号上最短; F波持续时间在宁杞1号上最长,在宁杞10号上最短,在宁杞5号和宁杞7号上的F波持续时间介于前两者之间,说明宁杞1号的机械抗性较强,而宁杞10号机械抗性较弱。通过抗蚜性的鉴定和聚类分析,将4个枸杞品种归为3类,第Ⅰ类:宁杞1号,为高抗蚜品种;第Ⅱ类:宁杞5号和宁杞7号,为抗蚜品种;第Ⅲ类:宁杞10号,为感蚜品种。【结论】棉蚜在4个枸杞品种上的取食行为存在差异,且4个枸杞品种的抗虫机制和位点也存在差异,宁杞1号在叶表皮、叶肉和韧皮部对棉蚜表现出抗性,抗蚜性最强,为高抗蚜品种;宁杞5号和宁杞7号在叶肉和韧皮部对棉蚜表现出抗性,但抗蚜性较弱,为抗蚜品种;宁杞10号能够被棉蚜长时间刺吸取食,其抗蚜性最弱,为感蚜品种。

关键词: 棉蚜, 枸杞, 取食行为, 品种选育, 抗蚜性, 刺吸电位技术

Abstract: 【Aim】To clarify the resistance differences of four wolfberry varieties to Aphis gossypii, so as to ascertain the anti-aphid factor and insect resistance site, and select the aphid-resistant wolfberry varieties. 【Methods】Electrical penetration graph technology (EPG) was used to record the feeding behaviors of A. gossypii adults on four wolfberry varieties (Ningqi No.1, Ningqi No.5, Ningqi No.7 and Ningqi No.10), and the indoor aphid resistance identification combined with cluster analysis was used to comprehensively evaluate the resistance of different wolfberry varieties to A. gossypii adults. 【Results】A. gossypii adults feeding on four wolfberry varieties showed eight kinds of waveforms, including Np, A, G, B, C, Pd, E and F waveforms. During the feeding of A. gossypii adults, the duration of E1 waveform on Ningqi No.1 was the longest, followed by that on Ningqi No.5 and Ningqi No.7, and that on Ningqi No.10 was the shortest. The duration of E2 waveform on Ningqi No.10 was the longest, and that on Ningqi No.1 was the shortest. The duration of F waveform on Ningqi No.1 was the longest, that on Ningqi No.10 was the shortest, and that on Ningqi 5 and Ningqi 7 was that between on Ningqi No.1 and on Ningqi No.10, suggesting that Ningqi No.1 has strong mechanical resistance and Ningqi No.10 has weak mechanical resistance. Through identification of aphid resistance and cluster analysis, four wolfberry varieties were classified into 3 categories: Ningqi No.1 in category Ⅰ was a highly aphid-resistant variety, Ningqi No.5 and Ningqi No.7 in category Ⅱ were aphid-resistant varieties, and Ningqi No.10 in category Ⅲ was a aphid-susceptible variety. 【Conclusion】The feeding behaviors of A. gossypii adults on four wolfberry varieties are different, and there are differences in the insect resistance mechanism and resistance site in the four wolberry varieties. The wolfberry variety Ningqi No.1 shows resistance to A. gossypii adults at the levels of leaf epidermis, mesophyll and phloem, with the strongest aphid resistance, and is a highly aphid-resistant variety. Ningqi No.5 and Ningqi No.7 show resistance to A. gossypii adults at the levels of mesophyll and phloem, with weak aphid resistance, and are aphid-resistant varieties. A. gossypii adults can sting and fed for a long time on Ningqi No.10, which shows the weakest resistance to A. gossypii adults and is a aphid-susceptible variety.

Key words: Aphis gossypii, wolfberry, feeding behavior, cultivar selection, aphid resistance, electrical penetration graph