›› 2004, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 645-651.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

论白蚁管涌(漏)与水利管涌的区别和处理

李栋, 田伟金1, 黎明1, 陈丽玲1, 蒙启枝1, 毛伟光2, 丽志平2, 黄建平3   

  • 出版日期:2004-10-20 发布日期:2004-10-20

Distinction between termite-induced piping in dykes and that caused by physical factors, and its treatment

LI Dong1, TIAN Wei-Jin1, LI Ming1, CHEN Li-Ling1, MENG QI-Zhi1, MAO Wei-Guang2, LI Zhi-Ping2, HUANG Jian-Ping3   

  • Online:2004-10-20 Published:2004-10-20

摘要: 白蚁管涌(漏)与水利管涌是两个完全不同的概念,而水利工程技术人员往往将其混淆起来,统称为水利管涌进行处理。本文则以大量的事实真相论述它们的区别和不同的处理方法,结论是用水利工程管涌方法去处理白蚁管涌(漏)险情,不但不解决险情,反而常常会酿成崩堤垮坝灾难。事实说明,白蚁管涌(漏)必须按照生物工程法进行处理,方可克服白蚁管涌(漏)险情的发生。

关键词: 白蚁, 水利, 管涌, 土质堤坝

Abstract: Piping in dykes can be caused by termite or other physical means, but technical personnel of water conservancy often confused them and called both as water conservancy piping in treatment. Based on a large number of observations, this paper discussed the distinction between the two types of piping, and different treatments that should be taken so as to prevent the collapse of dykes and dams. The termite-induced piping must be recognized as the biological occurrence and should be treated as such so that the dangerous situation of this piping can be avoided.

Key words: Termite, water conservancy, piping, earth dykes and dams