›› 2004, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 821-829.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

从弹尾纲和原尾纲的亲缘关系质疑缺尾纲(=近昆虫纲)的有效性

尹文英,谢荣栋,栾云霞   

  • 出版日期:2004-12-20 发布日期:2004-12-20

On the validity of the class Ellipura (=Parainsecta) (Hexapoda) based on the phylogenetic relationship between Collembola and Protura

YIN Wen-Ying*, XIE Rong-Dong, LUAN Yun-Xia   

  • Online:2004-12-20 Published:2004-12-20

摘要: 鉴于弹尾目(跳虫)和原尾目的尾部都没有尾须(cerci),Brner于1910年就把这两类归并为一个类群缺尾纲(Ellipura),这一分类阶元长期被许多昆虫学家沿用至今。Kukalová-Peck(1987 )在讨论化石双尾虫(?)附肢的总体结构(ground plan)时,认为跳虫和原尾虫的腹部侧板更原始,附肢无转节,将二者归纳成近昆虫纲(Parainsecta)。但是从形态特征、内部结构、比较精子学、变态类型和胚后发育等的特点以及线粒体DNA和核糖体DNA的测序分析结果,显示弹尾纲与原尾纲之间存在诸多重要差异,不具备较为密切的亲缘关系,我们不支持(弹尾纲+原尾纲)组成缺尾纲或近昆虫纲。据此建议取消缺尾纲(=近昆虫纲)这一分类阶元。

关键词: 弹尾纲, 原尾纲, 缺尾纲, 系统关系, 分类地位

Abstract: According to the absence of the cerci in both Collembola and Protura, Borner in 1910 grouped them together into a class Ellipura, which has long been supported by many entomologists in the world. As Kukalova-Peck (1987) discussed about the ground plan of the appendages of a fossil Diplura (?), she concludedt hat Collembola and Protura differ in having a more primitive abdominal pleuron which does not include the trochanter, and should be classified as sister groups, (Protura+Collembola) Parainsecta. But the evidences from the comparison in morphology, internal structures, comparative spermatology, morphogenesis and post-embryonic development, as well as the data of the molecular sequences between Collembola and Protura, did not lead to a close relationship. Therefore, the grouping of Protura and Collembola together as a monophylum is not supported. The assemblage Ellipura (=Parainsecta) should be rejected.

Key words: Collembola, Protura, Ellipura, phylogenetic relationship, taxonomic status