›› 2014, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (11): 1306-1314.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

稻飞虱翅型纯系后代个体的翅型分化对光周期变化不敏感

安志芳, 于居龙, 彭娟, 张超, 刘向东*   

  1. (南京农业大学植物保护学院, 农作物生物灾害综合治理教育部重点实验室, 南京 210095)
  • 出版日期:2014-11-20 发布日期:2014-11-20
  • 作者简介:安志芳, 女, 1990年4月生, 青海西宁人, 硕士研究生, 主要从事昆虫生态方面的研究, E-mail: 2012102087@njau.edu.cn

Differentiation of wing forms in pure macropterous and brachypterous lineages is less subject to photoperiod in rice planthoppers (Hemiptera: Delphacidae)

AN Zhi-Fang, YU Ju-Long, PENG Juan, ZHANG Chao, LIU Xiang-Dong*   

  1.  (Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop and Pests, Ministry of Education, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)
  • Online:2014-11-20 Published:2014-11-20

摘要: 【目的】为了明确光周期和遗传因子在稻飞虱翅型分化中的作用, 研究了3种稻飞虱(褐飞虱Nilaparvata lugens、白背飞虱Sogatella furcifera和灰飞虱Laodelphax striatellus)翅型纯系或近纯系在不同光照时数下的翅型分化比率。【方法】以经过5~45代连续翅型筛选后的褐飞虱、白背飞虱和灰飞虱的长翅型和短翅型纯系或近纯系为材料, 在室内分别测定了其在长光照(16和20 h)、短光照(4~12 h)和正常光照(14 h) 3类光周期条件下饲养后, 雌、雄成虫中长翅和短翅个体出现的比率及存活率。【结果】白背飞虱和灰飞虱的长翅型纯系M♂×M♀或短翅型纯系B♂×B♀在不同光周期下的翅型比率均无显著差异(P>0.05)。褐飞虱短翅型近纯系B♂×B♀的雌虫短翅率和成虫总短翅率在不同光周期下也无显著差异(P>0.05), 但雄虫短翅率在正常光照14 h和短光照4 h下显著高于长光照20 h下的(P<0.05)。当褐飞虱短翅型达到纯系后, 其后代翅型在6~16 h光照条件下无显著差异。褐飞虱长翅型近纯系M♂×M♀的后代虽有短翅个体出现, 但是雌虫和雄虫的各自短翅率在不同光周期下无显著差异(P>0.05), 仅总体短翅率在12 h光照条件下的显著高于16 h下的(P<0.05)。褐飞虱长、短翅型杂交筛选品系M♂×B♀的雌虫短翅率随光照时数的延长而升高; 灰飞虱杂交筛选品系M♂×B♀的短翅雄虫随光照时数的缩短而增多(P<0.05), 但当筛选代次达到45代时, 这种趋势不再显著。3种稻飞虱长翅型和短翅型纯系或近纯系若虫的存活率会稍低于长、短翅型杂交后代的存活率, 但长、短翅型品系的存活率在6~16 h光照条件下差异不显著(P>0.05)。【结论】稻飞虱翅型分化对光周期的反应受飞虱本身遗传背景的影响, 翅型纯系后代个体的翅型分化对光周期变化不敏感。

关键词: 褐飞虱, 灰飞虱, 白背飞虱, 翅型, 遗传背景, 光周期

Abstract:  【Aim】 To illustrate the influences of photoperiod and genetic factor on wing form of rice planthoppers, the differentiation of wing forms in three rice planthopper species, i.e., the brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens, the white-backed planthopper (WBPH), Sogatella furcifera and the small brown planthopper (SBPH), Laodelphax striatellus, under different photoperiods was studied. 【Methods】 The survival rate, macropterous rate and brachypterous rate in females and males of rice planthoppers under different photophases (4-20 h) were measured using the pure or near pure macropterous and brachypterous lineages of BPH, WBPH and SBPH whose wing form had been selected for 4 to 45 generations under the same conditions in the laboratory. 【Results】 The wing forms of the pure macropterous or brachypterous lineages of SBPH and WBPH were not significantly different among different photoperiods (P>0.05). The brachypterous rates in females and in the population of the near pure brachypterous lineage of BPH were not significantly different among different photoperiods (P>0.05), but the brachypterous rate in males was significantly higher at 4 h and 14 h photophases than that at the 20 h photophase. However, when the BPH became a pure brachypterous lineage, the wing form was not significantly different among 6-16 h photophases. The near pure macropterous lineage of BPH still produced brachypterous offspring, but the brachypterous rates in females or males were not significantly different among different photophases (P>0.05), except that the brachypterous rate in population was higher at 12 h photophase than at 16 h photophase (P<0.05). The brachypterous rate of females in the hybrid lineage of macroptery and brachyptery (M♂×B♀) of BPH increased significantly with the increase of photophase. The brachypterous rate of males in hybrid lineage M♂×B♀ of SBPH increased significantly with the decrease of photophase, but when the hybrid lineage was selected for 45 generations, the increasing trend became insignificant. The survival rates of nymphs in pure or near pure macropterous and brachypterous lineages of the three rice planthopper species were relatively lower than that in the hybrid offspring, but not significantly different among 6-16 h photophases. 【Conclusion】 The response of wing form of rice planthoppers to photoperiod was strongly dependent on their genetic backgrounds, and the differentiation of wing forms in pure macropterous and brachypterous lineages is less subject to photoperiod.

Key words: Nilaparvata lugens; Sogatella furcifera; Laodelphax striatellus, wing form, genetic background, photoperiod