›› 2014, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (2): 226-234.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

梨小食心虫自然种群与室内继代饲养种群生物学特性比较

郭丽娜, 方程, 李怡萍, 许向利, 仵均祥*   

  1. (西北农林科技大学植物保护学院, 旱区作物逆境生物学国家重点实验室,  陕西杨凌 712100)
  • 出版日期:2014-02-20 发布日期:2014-02-20

Comparison of biological characteristics between the natural population and the laboratory population of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

GUO Li-Na, FANG Cheng, LI Yi-Ping, XU Xiang-Li, WU Jun-Xiang*   

  1. (State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China)
  • Online:2014-02-20 Published:2014-02-20

摘要: 【目的】为明确梨小食心虫Grapholita molesta自然种群与室内继代饲养种群生物学特性的差异, 以期为梨小食心虫的人工饲养以及测报与防治提供理论依据。【方法】本研究对室内继代饲养的和从田间采集的梨小食心虫, 在室内同等条件下饲养, 较系统地观察两者的生物学特性并对其主要生命表参数进行了比较。【结果】在本试验条件下, 梨小食心虫室内继代饲养种群的蛹期极显著长于自然种群(t=-10.78, df=4, P=0.0004); 卵期、 幼虫期以及预蛹期均稍长于自然种群, 但无显著差异。室内继代饲养种群的幼虫存活率、 化蛹率、 羽化率极显著高于自然种群(存活率: t=-7.61, df=4, P=0.0016; 化蛹率: t=-24.32, df=4, P=0.0017; 羽化率: t=-6.96, df=4, P=0.0022); 两个种群的卵孵化率、 蛹重、 成虫寿命、 产卵前期、 产卵期及单雌产卵量均无显著差异。自然种群蛀果率高于室内继代饲养种群, 但差异不显著。生命表分析表明, 梨小食心虫室内继代饲养种群的种群趋势指数I、 净增殖率R0、 内禀增长率rm、 平均世代周期T、 周限增长率λ均极显著高于自然种群(It=-12.20, df=4, P=0.0003; R0: t=-11.72, df=4, P=0.0003; rmt=-9.77, df=4, P=0.0006; T: t=-12.05, df=4, P=0.0003; λt=-9.79, df=4, P=0.0006), 种群加倍时间Dt极显著低于自然种群(t=7.17, df=4, P=0.0020)。【结论】室内继代饲养种群在室内连续饲养50多代后, 与自然种群比较, 不仅各生命表参数和钻蛀危害果实的能力没有下降, 反而在与自然种群同等的室内饲养条件下, 表现了更好的适应性, 在本供试条件下, 后代具有更大的种群增长潜力。所以, 利用室内继代饲养种群进行的相关试验研究结果可以作为梨小食心虫预测预报与防治实践的依据。

关键词: 梨小食心虫, 自然种群, 室内饲养种群, 生物学特性, 生命表参数, 种群退化

Abstract: 【Aim】 Differences in biological characteristics between the natural population collected from the wild and the laboratory population reared more than 50 generations of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck), were investigated to estimate if the laboratory population has the evidence of degeneration. 【Methods】 The main biological characteristics of the natural and laboratory populations of G. molesta bred under the same indoor conditions were investigated respectively and their life table parameters were comparatively analyzed. 【Results】 The results showed that the pupal stage of the laboratory population was extremely significant longer than that of the natural population (t=-10.78, df=4, P=0.0004), and the egg stage, larval stage and pre-pupal stage of the laboratory population were slightly longer than those of the natural population. The larval survival, pupation and eclosion rates of the laboratory population were extremely significant higher than those of the natural population (larval survival rate: t=-7.61, df=4, P=0.0016; pupation rate: t=-24.32, df=4, P=0.0017; eclosion rate: t=-6.96, df=4, P=0.0022), but there was no significant difference in egg hatch rate, pupal weight, the longevity of female and male adults, pre-oviposition duration, oviposition duration as well as the number of eggs laid per female between the two populations. The rate of fruits bored by the natural population was slightly higher than that bored by the laboratory population. The results of life table showed that the population trend index (I), the net reproduction rate (R0), the intrinsic rate of increase (rm), the mean generation time (T), and the finite rate of increase (λ) of the laboratory population were extremely significantly higher than those of the natural population (I: t=-12.20, df=4, P=0.0003; R0: t=-11.72, df=4, P=0.0003; rm: t=-9.77, df=4, P=0.0006; T: t=-12.05, df=4, P=0.0003; λ: t=-9.79, df=4, P=0.0006), but the population doubling time (Dt) of the laboratory population was extremely significantly lower than that of the natural population (t=7.17, df=4, P=0.0020). 【Conclusion】 After domestication of more than 50 generations, the laboratory population, whose life table parameters and damage rate do not decline, shows a better adaptability and a greater population growth potential than the natural population. Our results suggest that the laboratory population can be a preferred material for conducting experiments.

Key words:  Grapholita molesta, natural population, laboratory population, biological characteristics, life table parameters, population degeneration