›› 2014, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (3): 335-342.doi:

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同水稻品种上白背飞虱取食行为的EPG分析

孙凯, 李冠华, 丁文兵, 张一君, 李有志*   

  1. (湖南农业大学植物保护学院,长沙 410128)
  • 出版日期:2014-03-20 发布日期:2014-03-20

EPG analysis of feeding behavior of Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) on different rice varieties

SUN Kai, LI Guan-Hua, DING Wen-Bing, ZHANG Yi-Jun, LI You-Zhi*   

  1. (College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)
  • Online:2014-03-20 Published:2014-03-20

摘要: 【目的】为探明不同水稻品种(丰源优272、R9810-T、华恢1号、明恢63、麻糯谷和Rathu Heenati)对白背飞虱Sogatella furcifera的抗性差异机理,利用刺吸电位技术(electronic penetration graph, EPG)记录了该虫在这6个品种三叶期稻苗上的取食行为。【方法】结合特定的EPG波形,考察了9个非韧皮部指标和22个韧皮部指标。【结果】在总记录时间8 h内,白背飞虱在品种Rathu Heenati上非刺探波np的总时间最长,其次是麻糯谷上非刺探波np的总时间,这两者间差异显著且都显著地长于其他4个品种的np总时间(P<0.05);该虫在Rathu Heenati上路径波Nc的总时间为8 523.41 s,是感虫品种明恢63 Nc总时间的2.24倍;该虫在Rathu Heenati上吸食韧皮部汁液N4-b的总时间显著地比其他品种短(P<0.05)。华恢1号和R9810-T上所有的EPG指标和感虫品种明恢63的EPG指标都没有显著的差异(P≥0.05)。白背飞虱在丰源优272上单次分泌水溶性唾液N4-a的平均时间更长,并伴随长时间的韧皮部取食。【结论】由此推测,品种Rathu Heenati可能存在不利于白背飞虱取食的忌避成分,并且在韧皮部外组织和韧皮部组织都存在抗性因子;在麻糯谷上仅存在忌避成分;然而,品种华恢1号和R9810-T可能对白背飞虱不具有明显的抗性;丰源优272可能是比明恢63更为感虫的品种。结合介体昆虫取食行为与传播持久性病毒的关系,这些结果也为利用抗白背飞虱品种控制南方水稻黑条矮缩病提供了参考。

关键词: 白背飞虱, 水稻品种, 取食行为, 抗性, 刺吸电位技术

Abstract: 【Aim】 To elucidate the resistance mechanisms of different rice varieties (i.e., Fengyuanyou 272, R9810-T, Huahuiyihao, Minghui 63, Manuogu and Rathu Heenati) against the white-backed planthopper, Sogatella furcifera. 【Methods】 Electronic penetration graph (EPG) was used to record the feeding behavior of S. furcifera on the seedlings of these six rice varieties at the 3rd leaf stage. Nine non-phloem variables and 22 phloem variables based on typical EPG waveforms were considered in the analysis. 【Results】 During 8 h recordings, the total time of non-penetration waveform (np) on Rathu Heenati was the longest , followed by that on Manuogu, their total time of np had significant difference, and both of them were significantly longer than that on the other four varieties (P<0.05). The total time of pathway waveform (Nc) on Rathu Heenati (8 523.41 s) was 1.24 times longer than that on susceptible variety Minghui 63. S. furcifera spent significantly less time on Rathu Heenati for phloem sap ingestion (N4-b) than other varieties. All the EPG variables on Huahuiyihao or R9810-T had no significant difference from those of susceptible variety Minghui 63 (P≥0.05). Longer average duration of watery salivation (N4-a) followed by long time of sap ingestion was recorded on Fengyuanyou 272. 【Conclusion】 It was inferred that antixenosis components and resistance factors out of or in the phloem region might prevent this insect pest from feeding on Rathu Heenati. Only antixenosis components might restrict S. furcifera to feed on Manuogu. However, Huahuiyihao and R9810-T might not possess obvious resistance to S. furcifera, and Fengyuanyou 272 might be a more susceptible variety than Minghui 63. Combined with the correlation between feeding behavior of insect vector and transmission of persistent plant viruses, these results also provide some information for control of Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus (SRBSDV) by using S. furcifera-resistant rice varieties.

Key words: Sogatella furcifera, rice varieties, feeding behavior, resistance, electronic penetration graph (EPG)