昆虫学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (3): 422-430.doi: 10.16380/j.kcxb.2024.03.012

• 综 述 • 上一篇    下一篇

磷化氢的毒理及害虫对磷化氢的抗性机制研究进展

王争艳*, 张闪, 刘之源, 常珍珍   

  1. (河南工业大学粮食和物资储备学院, 郑州 450001)
  • 出版日期:2024-03-20 发布日期:2024-04-17

Research progress in phosphine toxicology and resistance mechanisms in insect pests

WANG Zheng-Yan*, ZHANG Shan, LIU Zhi-Yuan, CHANG Zhen-Zhen   

  1.  (School of Food and Strategic Reserves, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
  • Online:2024-03-20 Published:2024-04-17

摘要: 近60年来,熏蒸剂磷化氢被广泛用于储藏物害虫的防治。但是,长期、不合理地使用磷化氢,导致储藏物害虫抗药性的广泛产生。了解磷化氢的毒理机制可以为磷化氢抗性机制研究提供思路。早期的研究发现,磷化氢通过干扰神经传导、抑制能量代谢和破坏氧化还原系统,引起害虫死亡;但近年的研究表明,磷化氢致死害虫的主要机制是抑制能量生成和通过干扰氧化还原系统来增加氧化损伤。早期的研究发现,害虫对磷化氢的抗性机制主要包括主动排斥磷化氢、保护性昏迷和增强解毒酶活性。近年来,随着基因组学、蛋白组学和代谢组学的应用,相继出现一些新的磷化氢抗性机制,如穿透抗性、磷化氢作用靶标敏感性降低、能量代谢模式调整。越来越多的研究表明,靶标二氢硫辛酰胺脱氢酶突变以及抗氧化酶和解毒酶活性增强是主要的抗性机制,而能量代谢模式调整可能是抗性形成初期抵抗磷化氢不良影响的重要机制。采用基因渐渗的方法研究害虫磷化氢抗性突变的适合度代价可以更精准地预测抗性突变的进化方向。研究害虫的磷化氢抗性机制和抗性突变的进化潜力不仅有助于理解害虫抗药性的形成和生物的进化,同时对害虫的磷化氢抗性监测和治理有重要的意义。

关键词: 磷化氢, 抗药性, 二氢硫辛酰胺脱氢酶, 氧化还原, 能量代谢

Abstract: The fumigant phosphine has been widely used in protecting stored products against insect pests for over 60 years. However, the long-term and improper application of phosphine has led to extensive phosphine resistance among stored product pests. Knowledge of the mechanisms of phosphine toxicology can provide ideas for the study of the mechanisms of phosphine resistance. Although it has been accepted that phosphine causes death of insect pests by disruption of the nerve conduction, suppression of energy metabolism, and destruction of the redox system, recent studies have revealed that the main lethal mechanisms involve inhibiting the energy production, and disturbing redox system to increase oxidative damage. Earlier studies demonstrated that the mechanisms of phosphine resistance mainly included active exclusion of phosphine, protective narcosis, and upregulation of detoxification enzyme activities. In recent years, with the application of genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, some novel resistance mechanisms, such as penetration resistance, decreased sensitivity of the target of phosphine, and reprogrammed energy metabolism, have been proposed. Increasing researches supported that strong phosphine resistance should be mainly attributed to mutations of the target dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase and upregulation of antioxidase and detoxification enzyme activities, while reprogrammed energy metabolism is a possible strategy adopted to counteract the negative influence of phosphine during the early stage of resistance formation. Application of gene introgression in the study of fitness costs associated with phosphine resistance mutations facilitates precisely predicting the evolution direction of resistance mutations. Knowledge of the mechanisms of phosphine resistance and the evolutionary potential of resistance mutations not only helps understand pesticide resistance development and biological evolution, but also provides insights into the monitoring and management of phosphine resistance.

Key words: Phosphine, pesticide resistance, dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase, redox, energy metabolism