昆虫学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (10): 1428-1438.doi: 10.16380/j.kcxb.2024.10.012

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于基因组规模数据的蜡蝉总科系统发育关系

林兴雨, 尹新明*, 宋南*   

  1. (河南农业大学植物保护学院, 河南省害虫绿色防控国际联合实验室, 河南省害虫生物防控工程实验室, 郑州 450046)
  • 出版日期:2024-10-20 发布日期:2024-11-18

Phylogenetic relationships of Fulgoroidea inferred from the genome-scale data

LIN Xing-Yu, YIN Xin-Ming*, SONG Nan*   

  1. (Henan International Laboratory for Green Pest Control, Henan Engineering Laboratory of Pest Biological Control, College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
  • Online:2024-10-20 Published:2024-11-18

摘要: 【目的】基于低覆盖度全基因组测序数据和转录组数据重新构建蜡蝉总科(Fulgoroidea)高阶元类群之间的系统发育关系,为理解蜡蝉总科的系统发育关系提供基因组数据。【方法】利用二代测序技术获得了蛾蜡蝉科蜡蝉Flatida sp. 1种的低覆盖度全基因组测序数据,结合下载的蜡蝉总科25种(内群)和沫蝉总科(Cercopoidea)2种(外群)的低覆盖度全基因组测序数据和转录组数据,利用BUSCO提取单拷贝直系同源基因,使用Phykit根据核苷酸和氨基酸序列数据生成不同的完整性数据矩阵,分析蜡蝉总科的系统发育关系。【结果】基于低覆盖度全基因组测序数据和转录组数据得到蜡蝉总科单拷贝直系同源基因的数量为836~2 421。在蜡蝉总科的系统发育关系中,所有系统发育结果都支持菱蜡蝉科(Cixiidae)+飞虱科(Delphacidae)为蜡蝉总科其他科的姐妹群,且菱蜡蝉科、飞虱科、颖蜡蝉科(Achilidae)、袖蜡蝉科(Derbidae)、蜡蝉科(Fulgoridae)、象蜡蝉科(Dictyopharidae)、峻翅蜡蝉科(Acanaloniidae)、蚁蜡蝉科(Tettigometridae)、瓢蜡蝉科(Issidae)、杯瓢蜡蝉科(Caliscelidae)、广翅蜡蝉科(Ricaniidae)和扁蜡蝉科(Tropiduchidae)为单系群,而娜蜡蝉科(Nogodinidae)为非单系群。此外,基于4种不同矩阵利用最大似然法构建的系统发育结果支持蛾蜡蝉科(Flatidae)为非单系群。然而,基于氨基酸序列数据矩阵faa_all包含的每个标记利用物种树构建的系统发育结果中却支持蛾蜡蝉科为单系群,但是有相对低的节点支持率。【结论】本研究利用低覆盖度全基因组测序数据和转录组数据得到的蜡蝉总科的系统发育关系与之前的研究结果多数一致。但是,有关各科之间的姐妹群关系还需要获得更多的标本和分子标记来进一步明确它们的系统发育关系。

关键词: 蜡蝉总科, 全基因组测序, 单拷贝直系同源基因, 转录组, 系统发育

Abstract: 【Aim】 This study aims to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships among the higher-level taxa of Fulgoroidea using low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data and transcriptome data, and to provide genome data for understanding the phylogenetic relationships of Fulgoroidea.【Methods】 The 2nd-generation sequencing technology was utilized to obtain the low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data of a species of Flatida sp. from the family Flatidae. In combination with the low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data and transcriptome data of 25 species from the Fulgoroidea (ingroup) and two species from the Cercopoidea (outgroup) downloaded, single-copy orthologous genes were extracted using BUSCO. Different matrices of completeness data based on nucleotide and amino acid sequence data were generated using Phykit to analyze the phylogenetic relationships of the Fulgoroidea. 【Results】 The number of single-copy orthologous genes in the Fulgoroidea ranged from 836 to 2 421 based on the low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data and transcriptome data. In the phylogenetic relationships of the Fulgoroidea, all phylogenetic results supported Cixiidae+Delphacidae as the sister group of other families of the Fulgoroidea, and Cixiidae, Delphacidae, Achilidae, Derbidae, Fulgoridae, Dictyopharidae, Acanaloniidae, Tettigometridae, Issidae, Caliscelidae, Ricaniidae and Tropiduchidae are monophyletic groups. However, the Nogodinidae are not a monophyletic group. Additionally, phylogenetic analyses conducted using the maximum likelihood method based on four distinct matrices suggested that the Flatidae are not a monophyletic group. Conversely, when constructing phylogeny using a species tree approach with each marker present in amino acid sequence data matrix faa_all, the Flatidae are supported as a monophyletic group, albeit with relatively low nodal support values. 【Conclusion】The phylogenetic relationships of the Fulgoroidea obtained in this study using low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data and transcriptome data are largely consistent with the previous studies. However, more specimens and molecular markers are needed to further clarify the sister group relationships among families regarding their phylogenetic relationships.

Key words: Fulgoroidea, whole-genome sequencing, single-copy orthologous gene, transcriptome, phylogeny