昆虫学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (2): 192-199.doi: 10.16380/j.kcxb.2016.02.009

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

革兰氏阳性菌苏云金芽孢杆菌和革兰氏阴性菌大肠杆菌诱导的柞蚕蛹生理指标变化

付盈盈1, 马玉堃1,3, 任淑文2, 杨立军2, 刘春光1,付海燕1, 侯跃莹1, 杨峰山1,*   

  1. (1. 黑龙江大学生命科学学院, 微生物黑龙江省高校重点实验室, 哈尔滨 150080 ; 2. 黑龙江省蚕业研究所, 哈尔滨 150086; 3. 东北林业大学野生动物资源学院, 哈尔滨 150040)
  • 出版日期:2016-02-20 发布日期:2016-02-20
  • 作者简介:付盈盈, 女, 1989年5月生, 黑龙江人, 硕士研究生, 研究方向为分子生态学, E-mail: 444565008@qq.com

Changes in physiological indices of Antheraea pernyi (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) pupae induced by gram-positive bacteria  Bacillus thuringeinsis and gramnegative bacteria Escherichia coli

FU Ying-Ying1, MA Yu-Kun1,3, REN Shu-Wen2, YANG Li-Jun2, LIU Chun-Guang1, FU Hai-Yan1, HOU Yue-Ying1, YANG Feng-Shan1,*   

  1. (1. Key Laboratory of Microbiology, College of Life Science, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China; 2. Heilongjiang Institute of Silk Science and Research, Harbin 150086, China; 3. College of Wildlife Resource, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)
  • Online:2016-02-20 Published:2016-02-20

摘要: 【目的】明确柞蚕 Antheraea pernyi 对外源微生物防御性生理变化规律,为柞蚕的病害防治和合理饲养提供理论依据。【方法】本研究选用革兰氏阳性菌苏云金芽孢杆菌 Bacillus thuringeinsis (Bt)和革兰氏阴性菌大肠杆菌 Escherichia coli (Ec)为外源诱导微生物,调整至106~108 cfu/mL菌液,灭活后处理柞蚕蛹,诱导24,48, 72和96 h后不同时间测定血淋巴蛋白含量、PO活性、CAT活性、抗菌活性和溶菌酶活性等生理指标。【结果】Ec Bt 诱导柞蚕蛹导致各生理指标出现显著变化,但两种菌株诱导生理指标变化规律差异明显,Ec 高浓度诱导72 h会增加血淋巴蛋白含量,而 Bt 各浓度诱导会在24, 48和96 h增加血淋巴蛋白含量。免疫防御关键酶系PO和CAT活性变化规律在不同菌株诱导后差异更明显, Ec 诱导后,PO活性随着时间增加表现为先升高后降低的趋势,CAT活性呈现“升高-降低-升高”的规律;而 Bt 诱导后PO活性表现为“升高-降低-升高”的规律,CAT活性随诱导时间增加变化规律不明显,但有随菌液浓度增加而降低的趋势。对抗菌活性测定表明, Ec Bt 诱导都会显著增加蛹粗酶液抗菌活性,溶菌酶活性也会极显著增加,但2个指标高峰值出现的时间会有明显差别。【结论】本研究结果表明Ec Bt 不同处理均可诱导柞蚕蛹产生明显防御反应,但柞蚕蛹生理指标变化规律与不同种类微生物及处理时间和浓度有关,推测革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌具有不同的诱导防御反应机制。研究结果可以为外源微生物侵染柞蚕后的免疫防御反应规律提供理论指导。

关键词: 柞蚕, 大肠杆菌, 苏云金芽孢杆菌, 免疫, 酶活性

Abstract: 【Aim】 This study aims to investigate the defensive responses in the Chinese tussah moth, Antheraea pernyi induced by different exogenous microbes so as to obtain measures for the disease control and breeding of the moth. 【Methods】 Gram-positive bacteria Bacillus thuringeinsis (Bt) and gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli (Ec) were selected as the exogenous microorganisms. The concentration of the bacterial solution was adjusted to 106-108 cfu/mL. A. pernyi pupae were induced by inactivated bacteriafor 24, 48, 72 and 96 h, and the physiological indices including hemolymph protein content and the PO activity, CAT activity, antibacterial activity and lysozyme activity in hemolymph were analyzed. 【Results】 Ec and Bt induced prominent changes in several physiological indices of A. pernyi pupae. But the patterns of physiological indices induced by the two bacteria were distinctly different. Haemolymph protein content in A. pernyi pupae increased at 72 h after induction by high concentrations of Ec, while it increased at 24, 48 and 96 h after induction by Bt at various concentrations. The activities of immune defense key enzymes including PO and CAT changed remarkably. The PO activities increased first and then decreased, while the CAT activities showed an increase-decrease-increase tendency after induction by Ec. The PO activities showed an increase-decrease-increase fluctuating pattern, while the CAT activities had no obvious alteration after induction by Bt. Antibacterial activity assay showed that Ec and Bt induced a significant increase in antibacterial activity and lysozyme activity in crude extracts of pupae. But the peak time of antibacterial activity and lysozyme activity was distinctly different. 【Conclusion】 The research results indicated that different treatments of Ec and Bt can induce distinct defense responses in A. pernyi pupae, and the variation patterns of physiological indices are related to different kinds of microorganisms and treatment time and concentration. It is speculated that gram positive bacteria and gram negative bacteria have different induced defense mechanisms. We propose that the several physiological indices can be used as markers for immune defense response to exogenous microbes in A. pernyi.

Key words: Antheraea pernyi, Escherichia coli; Bacillus thuringiensis, immunity, enzyme activity